Hindus have not learned from the history about the untold cruelty, relentless terrorism, repeated attacks on Hindu Temples, continuous raping of Hindu women, constant insulting of Hindu Gods, incessant noise pollution through Azaan, transmitting Hindu hatred through Madrassas inflicting on Hindus for more than seven hundred years. Hindus are more responsible for allowing them to wage war against Hindus. The stupidity of Hindus is endless. They still support politicians who are openly supporting Pakistan and Muslim terrorists for their selfish interests. Muslims are taking advantage of these politicians’ weakness and dismantling the richness of Hindu civilization.
Pahalgam terrorism is only the tip of the iceberg. They have plans to make Bharat an Islamic country. Almost every day, these Muslim leaders openly talk about conquering India. The People's Federation of India has a plan to take over India by 2047 by equipping every house with guns, rifles, rocks, wooden sticks, and materials to make bombs.
It is time for Hindus to wake up and support the efforts of Prime Minister Modi to eliminate terrorists in Pakistan and all around the world, wherever they may be. The Prime Minister should also concentrate on the internal enemies of Bharat and eliminate the terrorists who are planning to destabilize Bharat. Let us look at what the experts in Islam said about their philosophy, their cruelty, terrorism, and plans to dominate India and the world.
“Hindu and Muslim cultures constitute two distinct, and frequently antagonistic, ways of life, and therefore they cannot coexist in one nation.” Mohammad Jinnah
On 6 December 1945, in a statement to the British Government, Muhammad Ali Jinnah, leader of the Muslim League, called for the creation of an independent Muslim state, Pakistan. He explains that Muslims will never be able to live in peace if they are in the minority alongside a Hindu majority and emphasizes that the two societies can't coexist within a single nation.
Islamic rule in India as a "colonial experiment" was "extremely violent", and "the Muslims could not rule the country except by systematic terror. Cruelty was the norm - burnings, summary executions, crucifixions or impalements, inventive tortures. Hindu temples were destroyed to make way for mosques. On occasion, there were forced conversions …. If ever there were an uprising, it was instantly and savagely repressed: houses were burned, the countryside was laid waste, men were slaughtered and women were taken as slaves." (Fernand Braudel: A History of Civilization)
“The Democratic system that is predominant in the world is not a suitable system for the peoples of our region.... The system of free elections is not suitable for our country. King Fahd of Saudi Arabia
At least King Fahd has had the honesty to admit the incompatibility of Islam and democracy. Meanwhile, Western Islamic apologists and modernizing Muslims continue to look for democratic principles in Islam and Islamic history.
Asghar Ali Engineer asked a question as to “Is Islam compatible with secularism?” He said that “Both non-Muslims and orthodox Muslims feel that Islam is not compatible with secularism. Fundamentalist Muslims totally reject secularism as anti-Islamic and haram. Maulana Maududi, founder of Jamat-e-Islami-e-Hind, had said, while leaving for Pakistan in 1948, that those who participated in secular politics were raising the flag of revolt against Allah and His Messenger. The Saudi 'Ulama, too, denounce secularism as strictly prohibited in Islamic tradition.”
That means Islam is incompatible with democracy. Even if one goes by religious text, the Qur’an emphasizes what it calls shura’ (consultation) (3:159, 42:38). Even the messenger of Allah is required to consult his people in worldly matters, and Muslims are required to consult each other in their secular affairs.
We Hindus must recognize that Islam and Hinduism are incompatible in their ideologies, values, practices, human rights, inclusiveness, women’s rights, tolerance toward each other, marriage customs, and democratic principles. Hindus must realize the gravity of the precarious situation the majority of Hindus are facing at the hands of Muslim minorities who are using every means to create fear among Hindus and drive them from their villages.
It should be pointed out that in the very near future that the Hindus are going to be cornered and another carnage of Hindus similar to the carnage during the Independence time, not too far in the future. It is a matter of years, not decades. Muslims stayed back only to recapture India through violent means.
Their loyalty is not to India but to global dominance and supremacy over all religions. They are in India not to integrate, not to accommodate, not to adjust and not to assimilate in the main stream of India but to dominate, subjugate, subdue, control and suppress Hindus through Islamic Justice which allows them to dispose of all Hindus at their will, reminiscent of Islamic brutal, barbaric and ruthless dominance of Hindu India for eight centuries.
Islamization using Sharia law is already taking place, which undermines human dignity and denies human rights to non-Muslims. Let us remember the resolution passed by the Council of the All-India Muslim League on June 6, 1946, to protect the lives of Muslims by breaking up India to create Pakistan. It says, “…the attainment of the goal of complete sovereign Pakistan still remains an unalterable objective of the Musalmans in India, for the achievement of which they would, if necessary, employ every means in their power and consider no sacrifice or suffering too great.” Similarly, Jinnah insisted that the Muslims of India are a nation with a “distinctive culture and civilization, language and literature, art and architecture, law and moral codes, customs and calendar, history and traditions.”
Ambedkar foresaw a bleak and brutal future for India as long as Muslims remained in India. He unequivocally advocated for the population exchange in the case of partition. He wanted Hindus and Sikhs from Pakistan to come to India, and all the Muslims from India to go to Pakistan. “That the transfer of minorities is the only lasting remedy for communal peace is beyond doubt...there is no reason to suppose that what they did cannot be accomplished by Indians.
After all, the population involved is inconsiderable and because some obstacles require it to be removed, it would be the height of folly to give up so sure a way to communal peace... The only way to make Hindustan homogeneous is to arrange for the exchange of population. Until that is done, it must be admitted that even with the creation of Pakistan, the problem of majority vs. minority will remain in Hindustan as before and will continue to produce disharmony in the body politic of Hindustan.” “The brotherhood of Islam is not the universal brotherhood of man. It is a brotherhood of Muslims for Muslims only. There is a fraternity, but its benefit is confined to those within that corporation. For those who are outside the corporation, there is nothing but contempt and enmity. ... In other words, Islam can never allow a true Muslim to adopt India as his motherland and regard a Hindu as his kith and kin,” said Ambedkar.
From the inception of Islam, its main mission is ridding of polytheism from the Arab world. This monotheistic arrogance spread the hatred across the globe. Neither philosophically nor scientifically are there compelling arguments in favor of monotheism, as opposed to polytheism. Indeed, as David Hume showed, there is nothing inherently absurd in polytheism. And as to the Koranic hint at the argument from design, Hume showed that all hypotheses regarding the origins of the universe were equally absurd. David Hume argued that, unlike monotheism, polytheism is pluralistic, unbound by doctrine, and therefore far more tolerant than monotheism, which tends to force people to believe in one faith."
He believes that polytheism is more conducive to maintaining peace and virtue in society. Its tolerance of diverse ideas and practices is readily accessible to chosen gods, encourages "activity, spirit, courage, magnanimity, love of liberty, and all the virtues which aggrandize a people." David Hume has argued that monotheism is less pluralistic and thus less tolerant than polytheism because the former stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one. In the same vein, Auguste Comte argues, "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator. Monotheism is not only inherently intolerant, but it also promotes violence and terror. We know from the Koran itself the hatred preached at all kinds of beliefs labeled "idolatry" or "polytheism."
Dictionary of Islam acknowledges that Muslim writers are "unanimous in asserting that no religious toleration was extended to the idolaters of Arabia in the time of the Prophet. The only choice given them was death or the reception of Islam." Implicit in all kinds of monotheism is the dogmatic certainty that it alone has access to the true God, it alone has access to truth. Everyone else is not only woefully misguided but doomed to perdition and everlasting hellfire.
Arthur Schopenhauer asks us to reflect on the "cruelties to which religions, especially the Christian and Mohammedan, have given rise" and "the misery they have brought on the world." Also think of “the bloody and terrible conquests of the Mohammedans in three continents.... In particular, let us not forget India ... where first Mohammedans and then Christians furiously and most cruelly attacked the followers of mankind's sacred and original faith. The ever-deplorable, wanton, and ruthless destruction and disfigurement of ancient temples and images reveal to us even to this day traces of the monotheistic fury [my emphasis] of the Mohammedans which was pursued from Mahmud of Ghazni of accursed memory down to Aurangzeb the fratricide.”
After visiting India, Tarek Fatah rightly observed, “As a Muslim, I found it fascinating that this is the only place in the world where Muslims exert influence without fear. Muslims are better equipped in India than in Pakistan and Bangladesh.” By avoiding an open discussion about the impending takeover of India by Muslims in less than a decade, Hindu politicians, Hindu organizations, and the government are going to fulfill the long-cherished dreams of Muslims to convert the country into an Islamic State.
It would not be too long to see the carnage of Hindus since they have no place to go. They will be shackled, cornered, tortured, and killed. The only option left for Hindus would be to convert to Islam to save their lives. If we don’t act and take necessary steps to curtail the inflow of Bangladeshi Muslims into India, control the intentional breeding of the Muslims to outnumber the locals, and root out terrorist cells and their atrocities, Hindu lives will be in perennial danger.
If Hindus fail to scrap all the appeasement policies toward Muslims, if they continue to ignore the statements of annihilating Hindus, if they do not take appropriate action against the Muslim leaders who openly pronounce the hateful speeches calling Hindus as weaklings, dummies, boneless, gutless, spineless, etc.; and if the government and Hindus abrogate their responsibility to protect the Hindus from being bullied, bruised, humiliated, raped, tortured, maimed, and killed, Hindu genocide is around the corner. There would not be any place for Hindus either to hide or run from the ruthless Islamic sword.
01 May 2025
Urgent support needed for Bangladesh Hindus 
